Where do you come from? A Sermon for Proper 14B, 2024

Where do you come from? It’s a question one hears from time to time, often especially when you’re new in a place, or just getting to know someone. If you hear someone with a strange accent, you may want to ask them that question—and if you’re just a bit brash or rude—you will go ahead and blurt it out. It happened to me from time to time when I lived in the south—and it still happens occasionally to Corrie in Madison. The question may be well-meaning, but it can also be off-putting. It can underscore difference, it can remind the recipient that they are outsiders in a place or a community, reinforce their otherness. 

Coincidentally, I was asked this very question after our early service today. We were chatting in Vilas Hall and someone dropped by to say hello and chat. She and I started talking about a venerable New England institution, and as we were talking she asked, “Where are you from?”–thinking I must have been a native of New England. I told her to hang around for our 10:00 service when I would answer that question.

We see all this playing out on the national and international stage. Questions of identity—whether that has to do with issues of gender, nationality, or ethnicity are hot topics right now. And so often it is the group with power and privilege seeking to categorize, marginalize, define others to exclude them from the larger community, to render them powerless and speechless and irrelevant.

I know exactly where I come from. A small town in northwestern Ohio, where Griesers have lived since the 1830s. My first ancestor who came to that area operated a mill in Montbeliard, Alsace before immigrating to the US. On the other side of the family, my roots go back to Lancaster County PA in the 18th century. There’s no mystery on either side of the family, no reason to take one of those DNA tests that have become so popular. When I used to return to my hometown regularly, I would often identify myself by my dad’s name, so people could place me comfortably in that community.  

In today’s gospel reading, as we continued the discussion of the meaning of the feeding of the five thousand, and now, the meaning of Jesus’ statement that we heard last week, “I am the bread of life” we are introduced to questions of identity and origin. 

It all begins with a significant shift in today’s reading. To this point, Jesus has been in conversation with “the crowd.” They had followed him across the Sea of Galilee, to listen to his teaching, and for healing. He had fed them miraculously, and they had wanted to proclaim him king. 

They had followed him again, across the sea to Capernaum, where they addressed him as “Rabbi”—“teacher”. But suddenly the term shifts and the crowd becomes “the Jews.” It’s another opportunity for us to remind ourselves of the Gospel of John’s anti-judaism and its attendant legacy in the antisemitism in Christianity and in larger Western culture. That being said, we should also note that the word translated as “Jew” here would be literally translated as “Judaean” in other words, residents of the Roman province of Judea, not necessarily a reference to the religion. Further, remember that when the Gospel of John distinguishes between Jesus and “the Jews” it is overlooking the reality that Jesus, and all of his disciples, were themselves Jews.

Still, in the literary context before us, “Jews” is an important marker of identity. Earlier the crowd had responded to Jesus “our ancestors ate the manna in the wilderness.” They are asserting their identity and their privilege. And now, they are questioning Jesus’ identity and authority. Who does this guy think he is? We know him; we know his parents. What gives him the right to say that he has come down from heaven?

There’s the question of authority and there’s the question of identity. Another way John is drawing on the traditions of the book of Exodus is in Jesus’ self-identification. Here, he says, “I am the bread of life.” It’s the first of his “I am” sayings in the gospel. He also says, “I am the good shepherd”; I am the vine, you are the branches, as well as others. 

 “I am”—it’s the response God gives Moses at the burning bush when he asks God, “Who shall I say sent me?” God answers: “I am who I am” or “I will be who I will be.” Throughout the Hebrew Bible, God will be identified as I am—usually with a description of what God has done for God’s people—“I am the God who brought you out of the land of Egypt.”

Here, however, there’s a different dynamic. The I am sayings are symbolic—I am the bread of life, I am the Good Shepherd, I am the vine… They use ordinary imagery to say something about Christ’s nature but also about the kind of relationship that is being offered. Jesus is not distant, speaking far off from a mountain, but near at hand, and emphasizing the life-giving relationship that is being offered to those who follow him.

That offer is an opportunity to adopt and live into a new identity as a follower of Jesus Christ, welcomed into a community where status and background don’t determine your place, where your previous life and choices don’t limit the possibilities of new life and new experience.

We see something of that vision in the reading from the letter to the Ephesians. The author urges their readers to give up every manner of sin, anger, evil talk, wrangling and slander—all powerful reminders in these days of the vitriolic discourse on social media and the demonization of one’s opponents. More importantly, though, is this “Live in love as Christ loved us”—it’s another version of one of my favorite offertory sentences: “Walk in love as Christ loved us, and gave himself for us, an offering and sacrifice to God.”

To bring it back to the gospel. The bread of life that Christ offers us, or as he says at the end of our passage: “Whoever eats of this bread will live forever and the bread that I will give for the life of the world is my flesh.” That bread is offered to us; that flesh is offered to us, and as we participate in eating the bread, we are entering into the life of Christ, the body of Christ. And we ourselves, being bonded to Christ, enfleshed to Christ, become the means by which others enter into that same relationship with Christ. In becoming Christ’s body, we become the bread by which others are nourished. When we walk in Christ’s love, when we receive Christ’s love, we become the means by which others receive that love as well.

Out of the Depths: A sermon for Proper 14 B, 2021

Proper14, Year B

August 8, 2021

As I started reflecting on the readings for today earlier this week, I found myself drawn to the Psalm. It’s a familiar one full of powerful imagery that draws us into the spiritual life of an author 2500 years ago and offers us opportunity to reflect on our own spiritual lives.

 And I thought it might be worthwhile to spend some time with the Psalm, and with Psalms in general to help us understand their role in our Eucharistic liturgy, and perhaps open up new possibilities for our own spiritual reflection and growth.

You may wonder why we recite or chant a psalm each week in our Eucharistic liturgy. Each week, following the first reading, there’s a psalm. It’s not a reading like the other readings, but a response to the first reading, meant to be a reflection on it and to repeat some of the first reading’s themes. It’s meant to be sung, or chanted, or read. When we read it at Grace, we usually read it in unison; but it can also be read responsively, with the leader reading one verse, and the congregation reading the next one. It can also, although this requires a bit more orchestration, be read antiphonally, with each side of the congregation reading a verse.

The psalms are prayers and for most of the history of Christianity, and of Anglicanism, they have been a central part of devotion and practice. Traditionally, if you read Morning and Evening Prayer regularly, you would read all 150 psalms every month. Doing that repeatedly over the years would cultivate a deep familiarity with them, not just with the words, but with the sentiments expressed, the imagery, the theology. In our current Book of Common Prayer, the daily office of Morning and Evening Prayer isn’t quite so psalm-heavy. Instead of a monthly cycle, there’s an eight-week cycle, and some of the psalms, and some verses of individual psalms, are omitted.

I don’t want to go into great detail concerning the history of the book of Psalms. If you know anything about the Bible, you probably know that David is associated with the Psalms. We’re told that David was a musician and some of the Psalms, though not all are attributed to him as author. But in fact, the book of Psalms is a carefully edited and compiled collection, brought together in its current form over many centuries. We know that because it’s easy to see that some of them were written long after David’s death. Psalm 137 for example, begins “By the rivers of Babylon, there we sat down, and there we wept, ere we remembered Zion.”

It’s clearly a lament, written by people who had been carried off into exile after having seen their city of Jerusalem, and their temple destroyed.

“Out of the depths I cry to you, O God, Lord hear my voice”

Psalm 130 may be familiar to you; it’s one of the 7 penitential psalms in the Western Christian tradition as a group often set to music. In the Protestant tradition, Martin Luther translated it and is attributed as composer. “From deepest woe I cry to you…” #151 in our Hymnal.

Many of the psalms have instructions for their use or other information about them provided. Thus, we’re told that Psalm 130 is a “Song of Ascents.” It’s one of a group of psalms so labelled (Psalms 120-134). Many of them begin, like this one does, with an individual’s prayer to God: “Out of the depths, I cry to you Oh God.” You may be familiar with Psalm 121, which begins, “I lift my eyes to the hills, from where will my help come? My help comes from the Lord, the maker of heaven and earth.”

What makes Psalm 130 particularly powerful is the place from which the individual cries—“out of the depths.” In the imagery of the Hebrew Bible, the depths mean the sea, a place of chaos, the farthest imaginable distance from God’s presence. And the writer of the Psalm doesn’t seem certain that God can hear him from that place—that’s one meaning of that first verse. I am crying out to God, but I am also praying that God can hear me.

Following that an initial plea to God to hear the psalmist’s prayer, the writer offers a statement of faith in God’s goodness and justice: 

“If you Lord, were to note, what is done amiss…

“For there is forgiveness with you

Then comes two verses that are simple yet powerful in expression:

“My soul waits for the Lord, my soul waits for him

“In his word is my hope”

The image of “waiting on the Lord” is repeated.

We may not think of waiting as a spiritual practice. For us, waiting often includes with it growing anxiety and discomfort—waiting for an appointment, waiting in line, waiting for someone who promised to come at a certain time and is late. Waiting often leads not toward serenity, but towards anger and resentment.

But here, waiting opens oneself up to the possibility of God’s presence, waiting to hear God’s response to the cry of verse 1. Waiting implies hope but also trust that God will speak into the silence of waiting.

And finally, in the last two verses, the individual experience of the psalmist is expanded to all of Israel, or to the whole community. If I wait for God, so too should Israel wait for God; for with the Lord there is mercy, It speaks to us as well.

We know about waiting, waiting in our own lives, waiting in the life of our congregation, waiting as a people struggling against injustice, in the midst of suffering, in a broken world. We wait for the Lord, and the psalmist reminds us that our waiting is not in vain.

“With him there is plenteous redemption

“He will redeem Israel from their sins.”

 A psalm written 2500 years ago, in a particular moment, by an individual struggling with her own faith, and praying to God for deliverance, became a prayer of the Jewish people and then was used by early Christians as well, to express their struggles and their faith. It speaks to us across the millennia, and it can speak for us. 

Often we feel like we are in the depths, alone, tossed about by chaotic times, turbulent seas. We feel we are far from God; that if we are crying out, there is no one to hear us, and we’re not sure that God, if there is a God, can hear us. But our cries can be acts of faith in themselves, assertions of hope that God will deliver us in the midst of our distress and suffering. And so we wait on the Lord, for in God there is plenteous redemption.

I am going to end by reading to you another translation of it, that by the great Jewish literary scholar and critic Robert Alter. Alter recently published his translation of the whole Hebrew Bible. It’s idiosyncratic but reflects his deep understanding of the Hebrew language, of the English language, and of the faith of the peoples who wrote the texts and have lived with hese texts for the last 2500 years:

From the depths I called you Lord,
                        Master, hear my voice.

                        May Your ears listen close to the voice of my plea

Were you, O Yah, to watch for wrongs,

            Master, who could endure

For forgiveness is Yours

            So that You may be feared.

I hoped for the Lord, my being hoped

            And for his word I waited.

My being for the Master—

            More than the dawn-watchers watch for the dawn.

Wait, O Israel, for the Lord,

            For with the Lord is steadfast kindness,

                        And great redemption is with Him

And He will redeem Israel

            From all its wrongs.