Unknown's avatar

About djgrieser

I have been Rector of Grace Episcopal Church in Madison, WI since 2009. I'm passionate about Jesus Christ and about connecting our faith and tradition with 21st century culture. I'm also very active in advocating for our homeless neighbors.

Life Goes On

Four deaths in a parish of our size in less than a month is a staggering burden for clergy, staff, and parishioners, especially when some of the deceased have been as important to the life and ministry of St. James as some of those to whom we have said good-bye recently.

As a priest, I’ve found that there is no more important aspect of ministry than to be with people as they die and as they grieve. It’s not that what we say or do can ease the suffering or loss. There’s nothing I detest more than mouthing platitudes, so don’t expect them from me. Rather, it’s what sometimes is called by pastoral care givers “a ministry of presence.” I’m not even sure what that means most of the time. What I do know is that for me, being with dying and grieving people is one of the places where I encounter God’s presence. It’s a holy time, a reminder of what we are about as Christians. It is a time to honor the dignity of human persons and to reach out, in faith, to God.

It’s also a time when I give thanks for the Book of Common Prayer. The language and poetry of the burial services, the beauty of the prayers, the brave acclamation of faith in God that resonates throughout the services, are always deeply moving. As a priest, when my own words might fail me, there’s always the BCP that will say what needs to be said. The language of the BCP never fails to move me, even, or especially, when I am officiating.

The light burden of being under Bishop Henderson’s yoke

One of the things that most surprised me as I was going through the ordination process was my developing relationship with Bishop Henderson. You may already have guessed that I am not someone who responds well to authority figures; indeed throughout my life I have taken a decidedly skeptical stance towards those in power, whether they be my parents, my bosses, my academic advisors, department chairs, or yes, my rectors.

But I’ve discovered there are limits to that skepticism. Bishop Henderson has laid his hands on me three times–once to confirm me, and at my ordinations to the diaconate and to the priesthood. That creates a deep and lasting bond. Over the last few years, as I’ve watched Bishop Henderson negotiate his way through the current conflicts in the church, I have come to admire and respect him more and more. He is a man of deep conviction, deep faith, and deep attachment to the Anglican vision; and he has worked indefatigably to preserve the Episcopal Church’s place in the Anglican Communion. In the midst of all the noise that we have heard coming from the media and blogging circus surrounding the House of Bishops meeting in New Orleans, we would do well to play close attention to the words he has written for us. You can read his pastoral letter here: houseof-bishopsnew-orleans07.pdf

Let the spin begin

The wait is over, but the waiting has only begun. Late this afternoon, the House of Bishops, meeting in New Orleans, released their response to the Primates’ Communique from last February. The gist of it consists of eight bullet points which I quote:

  • We reconfirm that resolution B033 of General Convention 2006 (The Election of Bishops) calls upon bishops with jurisdiction and Standing Committees “to exercise restraint by not consenting to the consecration of any candidate to the episcopate whose manner of life presents a challenge to the wider church and will lead to further strains on communion.”
  • We pledge as a body not to authorize public rites for the blessing of same-sex unions.
  • We commend our Presiding Bishop’s plan for episcopal visitors. * We deplore incursions into our jurisdictions by uninvited bishops and call for them to end.
  • We support the Presiding Bishop in seeking communion-wide consultation in a manner that is in accord with our Constitution and Canons.
  • We call for increasing implementation of the listening process across the Communion and for a report on its progress to Lambeth 2008.
  • We support the Archbishop of Canterbury in his expressed desire to explore ways for the Bishop of New Hampshire to participate in the Lambeth Conference.
  • We call for unequivocal and active commitment to the civil rights, safety, and dignity of gay and lesbian persons.

The entire text may be found at Episcope

A quick reading of the entire text suggests that the bishops have delivered to the Primates what they wanted. Whether the conservatives will see it that way is another story. Indeed,  several bishops left the meeting after the departure of the Archbishop of Canterbury. This week they are meeting with a wide variety of people from all sorts of Anglican “churches” in the US. Called “Common Cause,” it seems to be an attempt on the part of Bishop Duncan of Pittsburgh to create a united alternative to the Episcopal Church. Whether that goal is accomplished is highly doubtful. Stay tuned.

Marvelous Coincidences

I’ve hinted at this to some of you, but I think now is the time to come clean. My first exposure to the Episcopal Church had to do with a pipe organ. I’m not sure anymore when this took place.  I think it was 1973 or 1974. My dad bought a pipe organ. Trinity Episcopal Church in Bryan, Ohio, was relocating because of an expansion project at Bryan High School. Before they demolished the building, they held an auction at which they tried to sell everything. My dad came home that Saturday afternoon and told us he bought the pipe organ for $100.

My dad, in addition to being a building contractor and carpenter, was a scavenger and a pack rat. Whenever he was remodeling an old house, and in the 60s and 70s that meant “updating,” he pulled all of the old woodwork, doors, hardware, whatever he thought he might one day use. Well, the same thing was true with this pipe organ. It had a beautiful case made of quarter-sawn oak (same material Hal used on ours) and knew he could use it to make furniture, paneling, and who knows what else.

So, one Friday, one of his employees and I began dismantling the organ. We had to get it out by Saturday evening. It was the dirtiest job I ever had (100 years of dust and soot) but we dutifully pulled out all of the pipes, the electronics, the case, of course, and all of the wood in the frame. We got done before the deadline, and began stripping all of the woodwork in the church as well.

Over the years, my dad turned the case, the console, and much of the frame into furniture. If memory serves me correctly, the top of the kitchen table dad made for me is of elm, taken from the framework. I have no idea where the rest of the wood ended up. I do know he made a desk out of the console for one of my sisters.

The pipes and all of the rest of the innards were put in the barn on my aunts’ farm. Eventually, the metal was sold for scrap. Looking back, I don’t know if the church was unaware of organ reclamation projects like the Organ Clearinghouse. I know that my dad, as an avid and gifted church musician himself, always felt a little bit sad that  the organ he purchased never made music again.

It’s been over thirty years, of course, but as I watched the organ being unloaded, and as I have watched Hal and his crew carefully put the pieces together, my memory of those two August days come back to me. I couldn’t have imagined back then that I would be watching the installation of a pipe organ in the Episcopal Church where I serve as priest, and I’m sure my dad couldn’t have imagined it either. But there is a wonderful symmetry in that. My dad  used his gifts to ensure that the organ he purchased would continue to have life and to bring beauty and joy to those who received the items he made from it.

I’ve still got a pipe from that organ. It’s a small one; a memento of days long past. One day, when I retrieve it, I will take possession of the organ bench from that organ. My mother still has it, but it has my name on it. I’ve never attended the Episcopal Church in Bryan, Ohio that was built in the mid-70s. I didn’t grow up there; my home town is around 20 miles away, but my dad built lots of houses there in the 60s and 70s. But one day, I hope to worship there and tell them the story of how their church, and their pipe organ, contributed to the formation of an Episcopal priest.

What a Day!

I hope you had as much fun at St. James today as I did. The energy at the 10:00 service was palpable and the fun afterwards was great. I went back to the church this afternoon to check on the progress and it is amazing. You can tell what the organ is going to look like. They’ve got the frame put together. It is going to be beautiful, and yes, it is going to fill the hole in the front. Lots of people were taking pictures.

Update! Indeed, there are lots of pictures posted both from Sunday and from today, Labor Day. If you look at the photos, you will probably see people you don’t recognize. Some of them are visitors, at St. James yesterday because a pipe organ was being delivered. But many are also visitors, or people who have just begun attending our church. If there’s a face you don’t recognize, you might want to remember it, and if you see them in church next Sunday, introduce yourself and tell them they are already on our website!

There was a great deal of excitement yesterday, and it was a wonderful day. But besides the arrival of the pipe organ, what impressed me the most was that a wide variety of parishioners were working together on a project. We didn’t just unload a pipe organ, we also worked at building community.

The Revised Common Lectionary

If you are a lector (read the lessons at the services), you’ve probably noticed that we have switched this year from the lectionary in the Book of Common Prayer to the Revised Common Lectionary. Several people have asked me about this change recently.

In the first place, the lectionary lays out what scripture texts we use each Sunday. It consists of a three year cycle. We are currently in Year C, and on the first Sunday of Advent this December, we will begin Year A. The most important differences among the three years is that Year A focuses on the Gospel of Matthew, Year B on Mark, and Year C on Luke. The Gospel of John is read intermittently, especially during Lent and Easter.

The Revised Common Lectionary which is used by most Protestant Churches that follow the lectionary is different in some important ways from the lectionary in the Book of Common Prayer. Most importantly, it allows for the continuous reading of sections of the Old Testament (Hebrew Bible) on the Sundays following Pentecost. For example, this year we have been hearing the stories of the prophets, beginning with Elijah and Elisha, and following through Amos, Isaiah, and now Jeremiah. This gives the preacher the opportunity to make connections from Sunday to Sunday. By contrast, the Old Testament readings in the Book of Common Prayer lectionary were chosen for their connection with that Sunday’s gospel, so it was difficult to see the text in its literary context. In Year A, the Old Testament lessons will come from Genesis-Judges; in Year B, largely from Samuel.

There is also a purely mercenary purpose for our switch to the RCL. Most preaching resources are being prepared for the RCL, so when we begin working on our sermons, we can easily find commentaries on all of the texts in the same place (kind of like Cliff Notes for preachers; but no, that’s not plagiarism). Among the web sites that I draw on for sermon preparation are: the text this week and the Center for Liturgy. These sites are intended for everyone, not just preachers and they provide a wide variety of material reflecting on each week’s readings.

God's Creation–Ministry?

Did you see the article in the Greenville News today about the Easley pastor who is subsidizing the cost of gas for a couple of hours? One just has to laugh that it comes from a church named “God’s Creation Ministry.” How about putting that money towards the use and production of sustainable fuels, or towards mass transport, or well, any number of things that might benefit God’s creation. Read it here: “We just want to give back,” someone said. But certainly not give back to God, from whom we have the created world on loan, if you will, and are destroying it.

God and Empire

I was able to attend one of John Dominic Crossan’s presentations at Furman’s Pastors’ School this week. Crossan, a retired New Testament professor at DePaul University, has been at the forefront of New Testament scholarship for many years. He made a name for himself as one of the leaders of the Jesus Seminar and has published many books on the historical Jesus and early Christianity. He was prominently featured on the PBS documentary “From Jesus to Christ” which I often use when teaching Bible.

Given what I took to be his radical approach to the historical Jesus, I was curious to see what he would have to say to an audience of pastors. The presentation I heard was largely taken from his most recent work, God and Empire. His main focus was on the role of violence in human civilization and the way in which the Bible supports and undermines that culture of violence. He contrasted two notions of divine justice in the Bible. One is retributive in which God is understood to punish evildoers. The other is distributive, in which there is a vision of God offering equality to all. One of his tag phrases was “God does not punish, but there are human consequences for our actions.” He used the example of someone sitting down on an interstate highway. If they die, it is not because of God’s punishment, but because of their choice to behave in that fashion.

In the later presentations I’m sure he went on to argue that Jesus’ proclamation was one of distributive justice; that is to say that the Kingdom of God as envisioned by Jesus included all people and treated all equally. He further argued that because Christians view Jesus as the incarnate word of God, his vision ought to be the criterion by which we judge other biblical (and non-biblical) notions of justice. In other words, while there are two understandings of divine justice in the bible, one distributive and one retributive, one non-violent and one violent, because Jesus articulated the former, Christians have the obligation to view that one as authoritative.

It was an interesting, challenging, and humorous presentation. Look for a Discovery Channel documentary featuring him to play at Christmas.

How does your garden grow?

I’ve spent much of the last week working in the garden and yard. It’s a wonderful escape after Summer School and we are in the middle of harvesting vegetables. All of our kitchen counters are covered with tomatoes in very stages of ripeness. We planted a number of heirloom varieties that don’t do well if left to ripen on the vine completely. We had some great discoveries, too. An variety that is bright orange and has great flavor, and the copia, which is striped yellow and red. I’m tired of eating green beans, but we’ve got a couple of pounds in the fridge and a bunch more still on the plants. The zucchini seem to be winding down, and we picked our first four melons, but we haven’t tried them yet. And now Corrie is planning what we’ll put in the fall garden.

I’ve also been weeding the beds: crabgrass, various kinds of clover, mimosa, and the pernicious buttonweed. Yes I know about roundup, but as I mentioned in a previous entry, we try to avoid using pesticides and herbicides, and besides, we’ve got so much in most of the beds, it would be hard to keep from spraying plants. I enjoy weeding, except for the toll it takes on my knees and back. It’s mindless and one can gauge how much one has accomplished just by looking. Sure beats teaching, or the ministry, in that regard.

Priests (and others) in the news

There’s been something of a run of negative stories about Episcopal priests of late. There was the priest in Seattle who converted to Islam but was still functioning as a priest (her bishop has since put her on a year’s leave). There are of course stories of sexual and financial misconduct. But the icing on the cake was the story in Sunday’s NY Times about the ex-porn star who wants to be ordained. The article claimed he was in the ordination process. It turns out there were a number of errors in the article. If you want to get the real story, go here. By the way, that link takes you to Episcope which does a great job of tracking Anglican and Episcopal news and also works very hard to get the facts of the stories correct.

Today, the Times redeemed itself, somewhat, with an article on an Episcopalian Chaplain at St. Luke’s Presbyterian Hospital in New York. The article is here (You may need to register to access it).